Planning Bill ‘Wind Environment Protection’, let’s say England Nature Chiefs | Green policy

32 Presidents of the UK Nature Organization, the government planning to the government “environmental protection threw the wind”, he said.

Planning and Infrastructure Invoice In the committee stage Parliament aims to facilitate regulations for developers in order to accelerate their projects.

Nature bosses told the environment and housing secretaries that the bill was “unilateral ve and that developers could allow environmental protection.

In the bill includes measures such as eliminating guidance in execution of bats before creating a structure.

Richard Benwell, General Manager of Wildlife and Rural Link, said: “The government is right that a win-win is possible for nature and development, but the planning bill is completely unilateral.

“Defenseless types and indispensable habitats such as chalk streams and ancient forest areas will explain more to inevitable development than ever before. The promises of nature rescue efforts are subtle and uncertain.”

CEOs from charities such as national trust, wildlife trusts, butterfly protection and Woodland Trust proposed changes in the design to re -balance towards nature.

Among these, a warranty for front environmental benefits – new habitats such as ponds or forest areas delivered at the construction point – and priority to avoid damaging nature before applying to alleviate. They also argue that the bill should require certain, measurable and significant benefits to nature rather than possible improvements.

RSPB General Manager Beccy Speight said: “We have been promised to gain a win-win for nature and economic growth, but it will strengthen the decline of our most valuable habitats and wild life by offering what this bill does not offer.”

The government initially promised that the bill would be a “winner ,, as well as presenting the houses and infrastructure that the country needs, as well as back nature. However, the CEOs argue that they ride rude on environmental protection.

Craig Bennett, General Manager of Wildlife Trusts, said: ız As it stops, limited measures for nature in the planning and infrastructure bill weakens nature protection laws and threatens the constructive dialogue of wildlife and environmental groups with Defra [the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs] Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. “

In the letter, he says he can push the current types of the bill towards extinction, lead to irreversible loss of habitats, and that the government will legally make it less to meet the objectives of the binding environmental law. In addition, more sewage in rivers, more flood risks and valuable local parks, forest areas, rivers and wetland walks, such as problems such as local communities can significantly affect.

The CEOs also say that legislation weakens the habitat arrangements derived from the EU, which can be worn after Brexit. These laws were transferred to the British statute book after the country left the EU and still applied in Europe. The arrangements protect species such as hazelnut dormi, otter and struggling birds and butterfly species.

This week government Arrangements applied This will require a management plan to protect the shoes while making planning decisions, to conduct surveys for swaps 12 months before any application, and if they are found, they will not disturb their living spaces, that they will not prevent their dams or damage, or that they will not change their water resources.

Some developers will have to plant more trees to eat and use for dams. The arrangements follow the release of Beavers in Dorset in February.