One of the unique sales propositions of the Indian Premier League (IPL) is the ability to throw the fascinating aspects that maintain the attention of both the old time and the new generation followers of the game.
Such an opportunity that surprised fans was an example of a Bows (Kamindu Mendis) that exhibited its multi -faceted ability with the ball. However, the use of a cricket law that rarely found in other versions of this game twice for a week is guaranteed to be guaranteed.
The law 25.4 is related to ‘retired fruits’. The essence of the provisions under this title is as follows:
(i) A dough may retire at any time during the strokes, provided that he informs the decision of the referees.
(ii) A dough has the right to continue these inclined strokes if they retire for disease, injury or inevitable reason. If this is not for any reason, this fruit should be recorded as ‘retirement – not out’.
(iii) If a dough retire for any reason, the innings of this fruit can only continue with the consent of the opponent’s captain. For any reason, if the innings do not continue, this inclination should be saved as ‘retired – out’.
(iv) After retirement, if one slopes continues, only one small door drop or another dough must be retired.
Normally, in the jack, the dough is expected to continue to hit them until the opposite party rejects them. The history of the game is full of doughs that have placed so many premiums on their small gates that they did not want anything but in life without a break. Therefore, if the dough is left low only due to injury or disease, it expects the dough to leave the wrinkle.
However, in the IPL match between Mumbai Indians (MI) and Lucknow Super Giants (LSG), the recitation of MI was recalled by the team coach Mahala Jayawardene just before the final began. Tilak, who had a stroke in 25 of 23 balls, was forced to remove the ball and caused Mitchell Santner to join Hardik Pandya in wrinkles. Mi, 7 balls 24 running the target of the goal and lost the game with 12 runs did not pay the movement.
In the game against Punjab Kings (PBKS), Chennai Super Kings (CSK) Devon Conway hit 49 wholesale 69 when he was asked to retire. Conway, which chased the 220 running target, anchored the CSK response and held the 89 condition of the 51 balls for the third small door of the 51 balls with Shivam. However, the running score speed relaxed after passing the half -century sign that forced the coach Stephen Fleming to replace it with Ravindra Jadeja. However, this movement did not help because CSK remained below the target with 18 running.
Meanwhile, this was not the first time to use this article in the IPL for the first time in IPL. The first example retired in 2022 to lead Riyan Parag, where Ravichandran Ashwin played for Rajasthan Royals (RR). This was twice in the 2023 edition, with the players who hit the ball from the PBKS athava Taide and Gujarat Titans (GT) Sai Sudarshan. The player who hit a ball in the 2024 edition was reused this year after a one -year gap without a “retired”.
Statistics show that this provision of the law book was first used by Sri Lanka in a test match against Bangladesh in Colombo in 2011. Sri Lanka’s Inning and 137 running, both Marva Atapattu is a difference 201 and Mahala Jayawartene reached 150 running, 150 runs in relation to 150 runs. This decision is not made to increase the scoring rate, but to give other fruits against a weak Bangladesh attack. Even this movement was even protected by some observers who thought that this action sent a message that insulted the pottery pottery.
There have been some debate about the differentiation between retired injuries and retirement for other reasons. Such an event was played in 1976 in the second test of the series between the Indian and West Indian islands, the Spain Port was played in Trinidad. After 161 jogging in India’s first Inning, the West Indian Islands lost two fast small doors until 30 shots. Soon, Viv Richards, who received a bright 130 points in the first Innings, had to leave wrinkle because he felt restless. He did not inform Bishen Bedi, who leads India, about his decision to retire.
When Richards tried to continue his innings in the third small door autumn, Bedi objected with a score in 52 runs and said that the players who hit the ball did not leave the field due to any illness or injury, and therefore he should get permission from the fielding team before making a bat. This led to a challenging situation where only the batter Clive Lloyd had emerged. The Richards could only continue their inning at 112 after the fourth small door fall, and he and Lloyd saw a draw side of a draw. Lloyd did not have fun with this decision of Bedi and criticized the Indian captain for the “non -sporty” law.
How does the use of this law affect the game more often? In some respects, this rule can be replaced by the first 11 players in football and basketball. Such a rule allows a side to make a tide on a better difficulty that cannot suffer on a particular day. Usually, a slope that cannot find its touch is removed from the misery by dismissing, but there may be cases where it continues in wrinkles, but cannot take the will of the will. Therefore, this development will be the advantage of the stroke side in limited sea matches, especially in the T20s, where the risk of losing 10 small doors rarely occurs. Therefore, it is safe to assume that this provision will be more frequent than other versions of the game in T20 matches.
Before the result, an example that India will like to use this regulation cannot help during the opening match of the 1975 World Cup. India, which chases the 334 running mammoth score collected in 60 sea allocated by British bats, can only respond to a restrained 132. The main criminal behind India’s weak show was nothing more than the legendary Sunil Gavaskar, who fought all strokes, confronted 174 balls and made easier with 36 runs! It was one of the days when the great man confessed. Nor could not get the ball out of the square, nor did the attempts to go out have not succeeded.
After a while, he crossed a trance without appreciation of the degree of damage caused by his side’s efforts and reputation.
If this legal provision had been used at that time, it may have been removed from the Gavascar misery 10 or so far, the Indian chase gained more traction, and the last margin of defeat is slightly less humiliating. Unfortunately, Srinivas, one of the most knowledgeable cricketists who successfully maintained the career after the end of the active game days of India, was ruled by Venkataraghavan, one of the most knowledgeable cricketists.
To summarize, improvisations and innovations in the game help to take crickets in modern times and prevent fossilization in modern times. However, it is also necessary to protect and maintain the unique charm of this sport and to prevent the logical use of these new provisions in order to prevent it from being a matter of “impact and explosion”. The person needs an old and new combination to maintain the attention of the audience and to invite new talents to this fascinating game.
