I went to see Wake Flop’s Snow White in the cinema – and the rest of the audience disappeared in a magic way

I went to see the Live action of Snow White in Disney’s live West end of London – and I was almost the only one.

The repetition of a popular fairy tale 2025 mixed feathers long before hitting the screens a week ago.

A series of unfortunate discussions – the use of chef CGI dwarfs, the descriptions of Yıldız Rachel Zegler and visible arrangements to the original story – left the film in a bad promotional storm and left the theater seats empty.

The videos of the deserted cinemas in the Snow cotton scans have left the social media under the water, but only the theater goers shift to show their ranks at empty seats.

And last week I was one of them, but at first I enjoyed luxury.

It is not a bad concert to have yourself an art deco -style Leicester Square Hall. I had a jacket on one seat, my bag in the other – 48 ft wide screen could have been in my living room.

But once I soothe, innovation was worn out.

The film itself was enjoyable – Zegler’s songs were enjoyable, the dialogue was not extremely emotional, the love story was sweet, and there were even some funny moments.

In a series of empty seats in West End cinema, my coat in my coat and my jacket

The breakdown of Zegler of Colombian and Poland origin made film fans angered

But where there was a full audience where there may be collective cartilage or voice paleness, there was only silence here – except when I drowned on a piece of popcorn.

In short, a barren land does not make a fascinating monitoring atmosphere no matter how good the film is.

And this film, even though it’s good, will probably not have the chance to prove its value.

The echoing criticism of the new Snow White is his desire to never disturb.

Pouring Zegler, a Colombian and Poland -based woman, many people were angry.

Although the accompanying racist explosions are unpleasant and disappointing, I should participate in the thought that the story is not fully logical with it.

In a semi -hearted attempt to explain the name of Snow White, it is said that the title character has survived a terrible snow storm in his youth. HM.

Coverage is absolutely important. But Disney is completely about aesthetics.

I bought a great art deco -style auditorium on England’s largest cinema screen and practically for myself

The film was enjoyable for Zegler singing, a fascinating script and some funny moments

Star Rachel Zegler (depicted in this month), although he acted as a strong deterrent to monitor his own performance, he really dazzled the role of the title.

Live action remakes depend on the original costume, original songs, the original story – the audience here or with just small adjustments, want to relive the powerful nostalgia of the first animated films.

This is a shame, because Zegler really dazzles the role, but 23 -year -old has worn a strong deterrent to watch his own performance without realizing it.

The West Side Story star called the original animated snow white ‘dated’ and ‘strange’.

“ No more 1937, ” he said. ‘He will not be saved by the prince and will not dream about true love.’

(Spoiler). There are some small adjustments in the love story, but the irony remained the same in essence.

Snowy falls in love with a handsome money that saves him from the queen’s curse with True Love’s kiss. Does it sound familiar? Because it is.

Good intentions are only a product of age. I know what you mean – she doesn’t have to trust a man and trust him for salvation (etc.). But at what point are we literally get things a little more?

Love is not dated. Feudalism, bad stepmother, old men fall in love with a woman about sixteen times younger than them – all of which feature in the construction of 2025, then why draw the line in romanticism?

Only the theater regulars share the videos of empty cinemas in the screenings of Snow White Remake and I joined them last week.

Gal Gadot’s performance in the role of Evil Queen was dull and soulless (depicted at LA for the film’s premiere of the film)

Common stars Zegler and Gadot reported that they did not continue as a result of their different political views.

Zegler clearly supported Palestinian rights and served as a two -year duty in the Gal Gadot – Evil Queen – Israeli army.

Thus, the political differences of the stars managed to alienate all the continents of the audience.

If the military history had not been controversial enough, Gadot’s acting did very little to save him. The cheekbones had more movies than him, and his performance was dull.

As for the dwarfs created by the computer, there were two arguments.

Game of Thrones actor Peter Dinklage, Achondroplazi, said he would insult the disabled community based on a story he thinks of the breakdown of small people in a film is already ‘backward’.

And other disability campaigns felt that dwarf actors should have been given the opportunity to occupy the role as long as they were free from harmful stereotyping.

But Dinklage’s famous voice was the most noise, so the production team scrapped everything and thought on the careful side.

As for this, CGI dwarfs were just disturbing.

Game of Thrones star Peter Dinklage opposed the casting of dwarfs and actors in the roles of seven dwarfs

CGI dwarfs (painting here somehow) was disturbing to watch

The film remained below estimated figures in its three -day version and attracted only $ 87 million globally.

Although technology was advanced, it was not a patch on real people I was used to seeing in live action films.

But never be afraid! Disney suppressed all the concerns by throwing an actor elsewhere in the film. You can almost imagine that director Marc Webb has opened on himself to reach the pen and mark that box.

I think insulting talented actors with dwarfs reduced to a diversity leasing.

When I looked at my appointed seat (although not really needed), it was understood that this film was released five years ago, he would make his numbers and leave the box office quietly like other Disney Live action remakes.

The film was expected to earn approximately 100 million dollars for the first three days, but the opening weekend globally won $ 87 million and is below its average status compared to other last live action remung.

For now, it is still at the top of the US box office, but it really says nothing but defeating other movies shown in theaters – a little win for a Disney movie.

Nowadays, people do not really have a stomach for a boring, awake virtue signal that has nothing to do with morality and the people.

People are not angry with the film – they will never watch – they get angry with the messy cocktail of the political accuracy before him and miss the sign every time.

If you are still not sure you will go and see the movie – I recommend you to do it. You will choose any seat at home …