NEW DELHI: Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) endured a night to forget at M. Chinnaswamy Stadium on Friday because they recorded one of the lowest points in the history of the Premier League of India.
The Innings against the Punjab Kings (PBKS) were magnificent in IPL 2025’s 34 matches for managing 95 runs for 9 small gates in a rainy 14, which turned into a disaster for the house side.
With this performance, the sum of the RCB is the 38th common score in the history of the tournament, and over the years, a famous stroke collapse list.
Go beyond the border with our Youtube channel. Subscribe now!
Everything began to go downhill after the first output, the opener Philip Salt was only dismissed to 4.
Star dough Virat Kohli fell cheaply, only 1 ball directed 3 balls. Captain Rajat Patidar fought briefly with 23 (18 balls), but none of the others could hold the castle because small doors continued to roll at regular intervals.
Questionnaire
What do you think was the main reason for RCB’s weak performance against Punjab kings?
Tim David (not 50) was a prominent tendency for the RCB, because his last heroes on heroism, including more than six people, helped Bengaluru to form a respectable total. Punjab’s pottery made a clinical demonstration.
Arshdeep Singh, Marco Jansen, Xavier Bartlett, Harpreet Brar and Yuzvendra Chahal shared the spoils, kept things tight and open.
The lowest five IPL points
- 49 All Out – Royal Challengers Bangalore vs Kolkata Knight Rits (2017)
- 58 All Out – Rajasthan Royals vs Royal Challengers Bangalore (2009)
- 59 All Out – Rajasthan Royals vs Royal Challengers Bangalore (2023)
- 66 Out – Delhi Daredevils vs Mumbai Indian (2017)
- 67 Out – Delhi Daredevils vs Kings Xi Punjab (2017)
The RCB collapse repeated the memories of the lowest totals: 49 against KKR in 2017.
Tonight finds performances tightly engraved in history books for all wrong reasons.
RCB’s doughs did not respond to the disciplined bowling of Punjab, and fans hope that this trip will only be a one -time disaster.
As for the Kings pottery, sovereignty, trust and clinical execution.
