Jason Gillespie takes the Pakistan Cricket Board to court because of the lack of salary: Report

According to a report, the former Pakistani Cricket Team Chief Coach Jason Gillespie is legal action against the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) due to the fact that his salary was not paid after he resigned in December 2024. Tribune.com.pk. In the report, Gillespie said that the PCB owed him to the PCB for a test series against England and the ODI victory against Australia last year. The report said that Gillespie’s sources claim that PCB did not honor ‘written financial security’.

Gillespie even directed the issue to the International Cricket Council (ICC). However, it is not known whether the ICC has the right to mediate in this regard.

Former Pakistan Red Ball Coach Jason Gillespie claimed that he was still waiting for some fees from the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB). In his Instagram account, Gillespie published a story about his interview with the Pakistani media, and said the PCB should still clean some fees. Gillespie and South African Gary Kirsten were appointed by the PCB to the red ball and white ball head coaches, respectively by the PCB in April 2024.

The PCB promised a new era for the Pakistan team, but for six months, both of them had to resign after withdrawing most of the authority given to them, including being at the National Election Committee. Both spoke for the first time with PCB on financial matters.

“I’m still waiting for some fee from the PCB,” After reading a story, after reading a story, “Gary Kirsten and I sold a dream of building a team. Losing a game and suddenly thrown out of the window.” Meanwhile, the PCB invited applications for the positions of the National Team’s chief coach on the official website on Saturday and the High Performance Center Director in Lahor.

However, PCB rejected the allegations.

“The Pakistan Cricket Board refutes the allegations made by a former head coach on the lack of payment by a former head coach.”

“The PCB spokesman states that the former head coach suddenly left without a four -month notification period, which is clearly violating the contract conditions.