Andrew Harnik/AP
President Donald Trump started the week with a dam of tweets in the early hours of the morning, which exploded the courts for preventing the travel ban on the travel ban. However, in doing so, it may have made it more possible for courts to continue to prevent the ban.
People, lawyers and courts can say that everything they want, but I call it a travel ban!
– Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump) June 5, 2017
The Ministry of Justice must have remained with an original travel ban, not the politically accurate version of their irrigated.
– Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump) June 5, 2017
The Ministry of Justice should ask for a accelerated trial of the travel ban in front of the Supreme Court and seek a much harder version!
– Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump) June 5, 2017
In any case, we are extremely examining people who come to the USA to help keep our country safe. The courts are slow and political!
– Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump) June 5, 2017
During the weekend, these tweets watched a few about the law and the terrorist attack in London, including Saturday evening:
We must be smart, awake and hard. We need courts to give us back our rights. We need travel ban as an extra security level!
– Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump) 3 June 2017
In January, Trump signed an executive order that banned citizens from seven Muslim countries and stopped the refugee re -settlement program (and indefinitely for Syrian refugees) for 120 days. When the courts blocked him instead of objecting to the Supreme Court, Trump signed a modified version of the order. New forbidden He abolished the old, reduced the number of banned countries between seven and six, and added exceptions and waives. Nevertheless, the federal courts in Maryland and Hawaii prevented this, and now the Ministry of Justice applied to the Supreme Court to restore this second version of the ban.
The biggest question in the case on the prohibition is whether the courts will only focus on the text of the order, or Trump’s attention to determine whether the order is used as an excuse to ban the national security from the country during the campaign permission and even during the Presidency. The lawyers of the President argue that the courts should focus on the text of the order and postpone the President’s authority over national security. Trump’s tweets on Monday morning and weekend make it difficult for the courts to justify to do so.
Until the government reviewed the veterinary procedures, the travel ban had to be a temporary solution. However, Trump’s tweets show that the ban itself is the target. Trump uses the word “ban ında in the challenge again and again.
Stephen Vladeck, a National Security and Constitutional Law Specialist of Texas University Faculty of Law, weakens the tweets that the courts should not look beyond the four corners of the executive order ”that should not look beyond the four corners of the executive order of the courts. “Trump’s statements should be important (a point where reasonable people will probably continue to participate), President Trump says that the case tends to claim that the decision is an excuse, and that it is so difficult to convince the sympathetic judges and rights that the text of the order is important.” And when the courts began to look at the state’s statements, it is not difficult to find those who ask questions about anti -Muslim motivations.
Even the president’s allies acknowledge that their tweets are a problem. George Conway, Best Trump Advisor Kellyanne Conway’s husband, answered Trump on Twitter, stating that the work of the Chief Public Prosecutor Office, which defends the travel ban in court, is only difficult to work.
These tweets can make some PPL feel better, but certainly does not help OSG get 5 votes in Scotus, which is actually important. Sad. https://t.co/zvhcyfm8hr
– George Conway (@gtconway3d) June 5, 2017
Recently, Conway, taking into account a task in the Ministry of Justice, then followed to clarify his position.
2)… And of course my great wife. That’s why I said what I said this morning. Every logical lawyer and every political in WHCO …
– George Conway (@gtconway3d) June 5, 2017
3)… He agrees with me (as some said to me). PT cannot be emphasized enough to tweet on legal issues…
– George Conway (@gtconway3d) June 5, 2017
4)… seriously weaken the administrator agenda and Potus – and those who support him should strengthen this PT and not shy about it.
– George Conway (@gtconway3d) June 5, 2017
Trump can soon see that his tweets are used against him in court. Omar Jadwat, an Aclu lawyer who discussed the case before the 4th Circuit Court of Appeal, said . Washington Post This morning, Aclu’s legal team is thinking of adding Trump’s tweets in front of the Supreme Court. “Tweets are really weakening the true narrative that the President’s lawyers are trying to put forward, so regardless of what the President said in the past, the second ban is completely runner if you look at their own conditions,” he said. Post.
