Seven years after the post -test, India still had an ideal spare for Harik Pandya

Hardik played 11 tests for India, where he bought 17 small doors and made 532 running.
Fast Bowling is a versatile, especially in the tests. South Africa, England and Australia, such as teams are lucky to be abundant; It is an area where India has been fighting for recent years. In the 80s and 90s, the giant giant put the bar so high that no one has ever approached his talents. Later, the gaze was shown in the early 2000s by Irfan Pathan and later by Hardik Pandya.
HARDIK PANDYA-REAL FAST VISION
In 2018, the 31 -year -old child played a series of back injuries before being defeated. In 11 tests, Trent Bridge had 17 small gates, including a fifer against England, and even conducted 532 runs on average on average. A fresh England tour is on us and a multi -faceted quality that India Team missed again.
The 4 tests in the UK had 164 runs on average, an average of fifty and 10 small gates at an average of 24. So, if it were there, things would be much easier. However, the main problem is not the lack of Pandya, but the absence of other options. Yes, India chose Nitish Kumar Reddy and Shardul Thakur, but to tell the truth, they would find it hard to meet Pandya’s heroism.
Is Nitish Redy & Shardul Thakur right to say versatile?
Nitish scored a ton of goals in Australia and ended with 298 runs on the tour, with an average of 37, but Bowling was carved in five small gates and 4,31 economies in five games. On the other hand, Shardul seems to be returning to the test team years later, based on the abuse in the UK, for the last time.
In the 2021 series, he had received 10 small doors in 4 matches in an average of 37, but he went to reduce his three-fifty years of order-average 24. In addition, the numbers are good, but they cannot trust the original versatile. This also emphasizes the problem that there are no high quality players from the local transfer.
What options do we have?
In fact, in India, except Nitish and Shardul, there is no staff for England just before the main round. As for Harshit Rana, he has a FC tone, but he was exposed to Australia, where the technique was completely running 7.
What are the future options for India? Arshin is playing for Kulkarni Mahashtra and made 202 running in 4 games on average. In addition, it only took three small doors. Krish Bhagat from Punjap was sometimes spoken, but so far he only made 55 runs in 3 FC matches and took three small doors.
Gujarat’s Jaymeet Patel seems to be a good option. He scored 661 running in 9 games, it was 50, and he also took 10 small doors. Rest, we will wait until we find the replacement of Hardik Pandya or we will continue to wait.
Editor’s selection
Cricket Gautam Gambhir opposed Shubman Gill to include Sai Sudharsan in India’s test team
Best stories