Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc’s Disiscalizing: What is wrong in China GP and the results | F1 News

After the disqualification of Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton in the China Grand Prix, Bernie Collins of Sky Sports F1 are more closely closely looking at what happened and the future results.

Leclerc’s car was 1KG below the 800kg car weight limit, and the board of Hamilton under the car was overloaded by half a millimeter.

The couple was fifth and sixth in the race, but Ferrari came out of the Grand Prix of Sunday without any points.

Has Ferrari installation changes contributed to the disqualification of Hamilton?

Hamilton won the Sprint of Saturday, but Ferrari, like everyone else, has made installation changes to harmonize or heal for Sunday’s race.

Bernie says: “I don’t think it is unusual to change the installation after Sprint because you know that you will never work 100kg fuel in Sprint.

“One of these changes may be to raise your right height because you know that you need to start with higher fuel.

“What is different between this and Austin two years ago [when Hamilton’s Mercedes was excluded for the same reason]You were not allowed to change the installation between Sprint and the main race, so when you read wood abrasion in Sprint, you cannot react to it.

“Sprint had much more management than the main race, because they took more rounds than pushing a hard tire, but they made a lot of management in Sprint in the environment, so I wouldn’t surprise me if the use of wear and fuel in the main race rises.”

Did Hamilton have an impact on the wood wear of two stops strategy?

Hamilton was the only driver who carried out two stops for Hards at the Tour 37 in the Tour 37, after starting the middle tires and 56 rounds.

Bc says: “Two stopper will lead to more pushing in each round. For Lewis, the only light bench is to make two clues on hard, and that it passes through that cereal stage that controls the tempo a little.

“The only thing for Lewis is that I don’t know if there is any damage to the Leclerc?

“As for Leclerc, who made the only stop, people said, maybe they didn’t know how much the hard tire would wear, so they didn’t have an estimated loss of mass for the hard tire, but they were allowed to take and changed the pre -wing of Leclerc.

“I don’t know where the loss of Mass comes from.”

Does Ferrari have a basic car design problem?

Interestingly, after Australia, there were whispers that Ferrari had to raise his cars for the season opener to prevent too much board wear. Although the team did not comment on the alleged problem, Hamilton was disqualified for excessive wooden clothing after a week and raised the eyebrows.

Bernie says: “It would be standard that everyone raised the car in Australia because of the tubers, which is harmful to suppressing and wearing wood.

“In Australia, Ferrari was not so strong. Some of them had fallen into strategy, but the qualification performance was not so strong, so perhaps they have a very sensitive cars in terms of Aero performance. All of these cars, all of the soil effect, but perhaps more sensitive than others.

“I would be surprised that Sprint in China was not a good indicator that you would be illegal in wooden clothes.

If they have what we call “Peaky” driving height, this means that there is a very small optimum driving height in which a good aerodynamic platform can be found, which is a problem for a car.

“You want to be suitable to run a series of driving heights because of all this piece. For example, there are intense pavements in Austria, so you want to add some driving height there.

“Maybe the Aero platform is very peak.”

What will Ferrari do now to make sure they are legal for Suzuka?

Bernie says: “Basically, the car being legal is the work of the racing engineer. Each racing engineer for each car lies with them where the car is legal.

“In both cases, they will realize why it is illegal in weight and wooden clothes. It would be nice to know if Leclerc is legal in wooden clothes. We know that Lewis’s car is legal because all cars are controlled.

“Teams will know how much the cars are throwing.

“I do not believe that anyone outside thinks that the car will be illegal in wooden clothing and hope that they are not controlled.”

What does all this mean to the relationship between Ferrari engineers and Hamilton?

Bernie says: “This is a tuber because Ferrari had the wrong strategy in Australia, he was disqualified in China, so they had to do better and had controversial false strategy because Lewis shouldn’t be a second time.

“Lewis was really fighting in the car on Sunday and the car was illegal. The changes in the installation did not react as he wanted, or they wouldn’t be too slow in the race and they were illegal.

“So this is a tuber. They pass through it and find the wrong one, Lewis can overcome it very quickly. But this is one of these small things that contribute to the lack of trust.

“When Sebastian Vettel came to Aston Martin, I asked him to think we were really good in our work.

“I really wanted him to go ‘If he calls me into the pit, I will do it’ because I trust the team.

Formula 1 goes to the iconic Suzuka circuit for the Japanese Grand Prix on April 4-6, living in Sky Sports F1. Now with Sky Sky Sports, no contract, cancel at any time