The EU Rules delay technology presentations, but civil societies say that safety comes first

Technology companies are determined that the regulation of artificial intelligence in the EU prevents citizens from accessing the latest and largest products. However, some non -governmental groups feel the opposite and argue that AI developers should produce products that maintain the safety and privacy of their customers.

Delayed launch of some technology giants in the EU

There have been a number of examples in which the launch of AI products in the EU was delayed or canceled as a result of regulations. For example, this week, the Meta’s Lama 4 Series AI model was released anywhere except Europe. AI Chatbots integrated into WhatsApp, Messenger and Instagram went to Bloc just 18 months after the USA

Similarly, Google’s artificial intelligence overlooks now only eight member countries, nine months later than the states, and both Ozan and twin models delayed European versions. Apple Intelligence became only available in the EU with the release of the IOS 18.4 after the release of the “regulatory uncertainties introduced by the Digital Markets Law” in the region.

Sébastien Pant, Vice President of the European Consumer Organization Beuc, said, “If some companies cannot guarantee that AI products respect the laws, consumers do not miss; Euronews.

“It is not the bending of the new features of the legislation to the new features released by technology companies.

See: EU’s AI Law: New Rules for Artificial Intelligence in Europe

EU arrangements force companies to create more privacy -conscious tools

The EU legislation has not always excluded EU citizens from AI products; Instead, it often forced technology companies to adapt and present them to solutions with a better, conscious of confidentiality. For example:

• After being put into court by the Data Protection Commission, the X agreed to permanently stop the processing of personal data from EU users’ public publications to train AI model Gok.
• Deepseek, a Chinese AI model, was banned for concerns about how his citizens dealt with their data in Italy.
• Last June, Meta postponed the training of overall language models shared on Facebook and Instagram after claiming that EU regulators should get a clear approval from content owners and still did not continue.

Kleanthi Sardel, a data protection lawyer working with the advocacy group Noyb, is that users do not predict that users are generally used to educate AI models in general, but what many technology companies do is often very little respect for transparency. “The right to protect data is a fundamental human right and should be considered when designing and distributing AI tools.”

Google, Meta EU laws are disadvantageous citizens, but their income is in danger.

Google and Meta explicitly criticize Europe’s AI regulation and argued that the region would disrupt innovation potential.

Last year, Google published a detailed report on how Europe was delayed behind other global super powers when it comes to AI innovation. While only 34% of EU enterprises use cloud computing technologies, which are a critical facilitator for AI developments, which were behind the 75% target of the European Commission in 2022, in 2022, while offering only 2% of the global AI patents in 2022, China and the US presented 61 and 21%, respectively.

The report revealed most of the crime on EU regulations on the struggle of innovation in advanced technologies. Matt Britin, the president of Google EMEA, said, “Since 2019, the EU has brought more than 100 legislation affecting the digital economy and society. This is not just a large number of regulations that are difficulties – complexity,” he said. Blog post. “Passing through the first regulatory approach can help to unlock AI’s opportunity.”

However, since Google, commodity and other technology giants represent a large market with 448 million people, the rules are financially suffering if the rules prevent them from starting products in the EU. On the other hand, they continue with launch, but if they break the rules, they may face heavy fines up to 35 million € or 7% of the global turnover in case of AI law.

Europe is currently involved in many regulatory battles with major technology companies in the US, and most of them have already led to significant fines. In February, Meta announced that he was ready to increase his concerns that they see directly as an unfair regulation to the US President.

US President Donald Trump referred to the fines as a “a way of taxation” at the World Economic Forum in January. In a speech made in February Paris AI Action SummitUS Vice President Vance rejected Europe’s use of “excessive regulation ve and said that the international approach should“ improve the creation of AI technology instead of drowning the creation ”.