Donald Trump’s management is faced with an increasing examination after a group of senior officials used the signal application to discuss air strikes plans in Yemen. Trump defended the National Security Advisor and tried to underestimate the White House. However, the deputies of both sides have given an alarm about possible security tours.
Mike Waltz, who accidentally contained a journalist, was invited by Trump’s National Security Advisor, and many people in Washington have questioned sensitive information.
Trump spoke NBC News On Tuesday, he defended the National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, who was at the center of the signal conversation. “Michael Waltz learned a lesson and he’s a good man.” He said.
Trump also described the section as the only disruption in two months and turned out to be nothing serious ”. According to the President, the presence of the journalist in the group conversation had no effect in the operation in Yemen.
The conversation was Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Foreign Minister Marco Rubio, National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard, Vice President JD Vance and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.
Some officials insisted that a classified information was not transferred, but critics argue that planning for a foreign militia bombing is often considered sensitive or confidential.
The White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in X that “war plans’ were not discussed” and “no classified material was sent to the yarn”. He added that the White House lawyer’s office is “guided by President Trump’s senior officials on a series of different platforms to communicate as safely and efficiently as possible”.
Jeffrey Goldberg is known for his sensational return. Here are the facts about his last story:
1. “War Plans” was not discussed.
2.
3. The White House lawyer’s office provided guidance on a series of different…– Karoline Leavitt (@presssec) 25 March 2025
Democrats want Trump’s officials to resign from the setback
The Democrats took over the story, saying that they showed careless attitude towards national security. Senate Intelligence Committee Vice President Senator Mark Warner said on Tuesday that it was “an example of sloppy, careless, incompetent behaviors especially against classified information”.
Warner added, “This is also not mindful that all these senior people are on this line and that no one is bothering to control. [who else was on the line]. Security hygiene 1.0.1. Who are all names? Who are they? “He said,“ If this is a military officer or an intelligence officer, and if they had such behavior, they would be fired. ”
Vice President, Vice President, who is a part of the group, to the strikes “error” and in question Although he did not explain this claim any more, he meant the rescue of Europe ”. Some observers say that Vance’s statement proposes internal dispute on the military action in Yemen.
The incident embarrassed the Trump administration, because he showed how a large military operation was discussed on a platform that does not mean extremely sensitive data. Goldberg said that he did not publish the definite goals or timing because they saw journalists saying that he could harm national security.
He also responded to Hegset’s accusation that he was “sold in garbage”. Msnbc“I haven’t seen such bad behaviors before. And the defense secretary seems to be a person who tries to deviate from the fact that he has participated in a conversation with all respect, in this presentation, and in a speech that should probably not attend.”
Republicans are divided into the subject. When many of the party stood by Waltz, when Trump said that there was a small shift, a few clearly criticized the misuse of information.
Don Bacon, a Republican Congress Member from Nebraska, Cnn“They put high degree of classified information on a deliberately classified device. I would have lost my security openness in the Air Force for this and much less. I will guarantee you, 99.99% safely, Russia and China are watching these two phones.” Nick Lalota, a republican congress member of New York, said to Politico, “at least completely sloppy.”
National Security Council, expression On Monday, he said that he knew the “authentic” nature of the message yarn and said, “how a number was accidentally added to the chain”.
Trump’s senior officials deny that any sensitive information is leaked
During the hearing of a Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday, Gabbard, Ratcliffe and FBI President Kash Patel was pressured by the Democrats on the signal scandal. “There was no secret information in the signal group conversation.” He insisted. Ratcliffe made a similar claim and said, “My communication… a signal message group can be completely allowed and legal and did not contain classified information.” Authorized, senior officials are allowed to use a signal, but it is not appropriate to share details about a bombing plan, he added.
US National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe said You, a democrat from Oregon. Ron Wyden would have agreed to “inspector or whether they use a signal or another messaging platform to share classified information. Ratcliffe announced that the signal application was installed on the CIA work computer when the application starts and that it was allowed as a means of communication for business.
Senator Mark Warner reminded the panel of a separate event in January, and after the presidential order, the CIA sent an unqualified e -mail to the Personnel Management Office that lists the first names and initiated the surnames of new recruitment in the agency. Mark Warner called this pattern “reckless” and “sloppy ve and tagged the signal fiasco section ız a model we repeat very often”.
You. Angus King suppressed Gabbard that timing, targets and weapons were generally classified for strikes in Yemen. King is difficult for me to believe that targets, timing and weapons will not be classified. ” He said.
The chairman of the committee is Sen, a Republican from Arkansas. Tom Cotton did not mention the signal leakage in the opening words. GOP focused on drug cartels and questions to China, leaving the issue of chat for colleagues, democrats and several Republican critics. Although some have argued that new rules were needed to prevent unintentional explanations, there was no clear sign that the Congress would do more.
It is still unclear whether Waltz will resign or print him to leave Trump. For now, the president pointed to full support. The White House continues to insist that no law is broken, not a threat to national security, which is called an unfortunate error for the conversation.
Cryptopolitan Academy: Would you like to grow your money in 2025? Learn how to do it with defi in our upcoming Web SClass. Save your place
