Trump Management cancels NIH scientific integrity policy
National Health Institutes, Trump administration in line with the directives of diversity and diversity due to the language of the policy, he said.
Climatewire | National Health Institutes canceled a scientific policy of integrity aimed at protecting research and communication from political intervention, stating the commitment of diversity and involving policy.
One policy was canceled on Friday evening to “adapt to the priorities of the administration” Notification sent by NIH. Notification says that NIH, the largest source of financing for medical research in the world, will now follow the broader scientific integrity policy of the Department of Health and Human Services.
Nıh is determined to protect the principles of scientific integrity, Nıh says NIH.
On support of science journalism
If you enjoy this article, consider supporting our award -winning journalism subscribe to. By buying a subscription, you help to ensure the future of effective stories about the discoveries and ideas that shape our world today.
The last nıh policy Updated in the last months of Biden management“Inseparable components of diversity, equality, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) inseparable components of the whole scientific process”.
“Attention to Deia can increase the success of the scientific labor, encourage innovation in the execution and use of science, and more fair participation in science by different communities.” He said.
Such a diversity language has not been included in the HHS policy.
HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon said politics was withdrawn due to the diversity language. The NIH policy said that Biden was “armed” by the Biden administration to “inject harmful and gender ideology to research”.
He canceled the policy and said, “NIH will allow science to return to the gold standard and to maintain the integrity of science through the HHS policy,” he said.
The movement worried that the Trump administration worries scientists and public health experts who claim to have already politicized science by eliminating HHS offices focused on health equality and climate change. Cancel the research grants Raced health inequalities and other matters do not like management and Removing health data From the HHS website.
“When someone returns a policy, they know that if they do this, they know that they will violate that they will remain in place, L Liz Borkowski, the Director of Health Policy Management of Milken Institute of Milken Institute of Milken Institute, said.
The agency cancel the scientific policy of integrity, NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya came in the second week of work.
Bhattacharya himself conducted federal research on racial health inequalities. Writing the 2012 article Found that mortality rates of black patients after heart transplantation were higher than white patients. During the approval hearing, Bhattacharya said to the senators that NIH would not be affected by the orders of financing and communication for initiatives that encourage diversity, inclusion and equality from President Donald Trump’s executive orders.
Senator Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD.), “The health needs of minorities in this country are a vital priority for me,” he said. “I do not see anything that contradicts it in the presidential orders.”
Environmental and Climate Health Researchers He’s already afraid That the Trump administration can target the grants. A lot NIH grant for climate research Examine how climate change can have great effects on color communities and marginal communities such as heat -related diseases.
Jennifer Jones, Director of Science and Democracy in the Association of Scientists Association, said, “It puts all science at risk”.
Only last week, HHS cut 10,000 personnel and Forced the best vaccination authority of Food and Pharmaceutical Administration. In his resignation letter, Dr. Peter Marks accused HHS secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of misleading information about vaccination security while the measles continued to spread to the country.
“It was understood that truth and transparency was not requested by the secretary, on the contrary, he wants his misinformation and lies to be obeyed in a obedient way,” he wrote.
The separation of Marx underlines the need for scientific integrity policies for each of HHS agencies, and argued that the workers in Jones should be able to inform political intervention accusations to the integrity authorities within their agencies.
“We need policies to protect and protect us from this conspiiled management, önemli he said.
Recapproved E & E News Politico, with the permission of LLC. Copyright 2025. E & E News offers basic news for energy and environmental professionals.
