19 The state suits Trump’s voting executive order: NPR

Nineteen states, President Donald Trump’s extensive execution order signed last week, taking into account the extensive executive order, the vote will create obstacles that can deprive millions of people in the vote, “an attempt to control the elections is an attempt to seize the constitution,” he said.

. caseIn a Federal Regional Court in Massachusetts, the fourth legal challenge against the executive order, it is in general to prevent various provisions of the executive decision of the execution decision, which lawyers have generally usurped the constitutional power of the states and try to change the election law by Fiat.

The case opened by Arizona, California, Connecticut, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Mainine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and WisConsin.

“We are a democracy – not monarchy – and this executive order is to grab an authoritarian power.” He said. “With this order, this president gives priority to the rights and will of the people’s rights and will of the search for uncontrolled power.”

Trump’s March 25 order aims to make dramatic changes in voting and election management, and threatens that if states do not comply, they may lose federal funds and face potential action from the US Chief Public Prosecutor.

Among the amendments, the executive order leads the Federal Voter Registration Form – an independent, two -party organ, an independent, two -party organ, which includes a copy of a citizenship certificate to register for voting in federal races. At the same time, it aims to prevent states from counting the posts of the votes that are mailing according to the election day but enabled them to arrive after the election. Currently 18 states allow.

The case argues that these changes cannot be ordered by a president, because deciding how the elections should be carried out depends on the states and Congress. He also argues that the President cannot lead the Election Assistance Commission to take action because it is an independent organ, and that adding evidence of citizenship on the Federal registration form contradicts the existing federal laws.

The case says that the administrator’s order “sowing confusion and puts ground for chaos”, because states and resources should direct the implementation of new training, test, voter training and coordination to lose the necessary funds or lose risks if they do not comply. “

This week, three federal cases were filed against the executive order. All of them were appointed to Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, the ruler of the US Regional Court on Washington DC on Thursday.

Two of these cases were introduced by voting rights groups on behalf of organizations that assisted voters. The other was brought on behalf of the Democrats of the Democratic Election Lawyer Marc Elias.

Trump said the execution order is necessary to stop fraud and “correct our choices”.

False allegations about the choice of choice have become a part of Trump’s brand, the most remarkable example is that it rejects the 2020 election loss.

On the way to the 2024 elections, Trump encouraged the fake theory that the Democrats would try to steal the election by helping a large number of votes. There is no such land evidence.

In fact, past audits have shown that non -quality voting cases are rare. According to the current federal laws, voters should prove that they are US citizens when they register to vote under the penalty of lying and that some states have taken additional steps to verify citizenship. Those who try to vote illegal can be deported to prison time and deportation.

Nevertheless, in response to the case that challenges the executive order by the Democrats, US senator Mike Lee, R-uah, Posted to x“Why are the best democrats sued to allow non -citizens to vote in the American elections? Lee’s mail shared In one word, “fraud”.

The cases that object to the executive order argue that voters will show a copy of a citizenship certificate to register to vote and that the 1993 Federal Law will create conflicts with the National Voter Registration Law.

According to a questionnaire assigned by voting rights defenders, more than 21 million American adults have no evidence of citizenship such as birth certificates or passports, or not easily access to one. In addition, Trump’s executive order named a limited number of documents that can only be used to prove citizenship: the US passport, a state of military identity cards with state citizenship, or a photographic identity given by the state listing citizenship, but most of most state citizenship. It remains unclear whether the birth certificates are a valid way to prove citizenship under the executive order. Only half of the Americans have a passport.

Meanwhile, Republican MPs support the federal legislation that will change the federal law to demand evidence of citizenship to vote. Republican home leaders expression The American voter’s law, known as the Rescue Law on Monday, “enters the action of” the President of the Law of Law Trump to guarantee our voter registration process and to protect the voices of American voters “.