Wisconsin Chief Prosecutor asked the Liberal -controlled State Supreme Court on Sunday to stop the billionaire Elon Musk to stop giving more than $ 1 million to two voters, and President Donald Trump’s ally’s planning at a evening rally.
A Court of Appeal on Saturday rejected the legal challenge of Democrat Josh Kaul, who argued that Mr. Musk’s proposal violated a state law that prohibits valuation in exchange for votes.
Wisconsin’s ideological control of the court is strictly objected to the high court election on Tuesday. Liberals currently have 4-3 majority.
Musk’s Green Bay at 19:30 at the EST at the rally planned at the EST, “activist” online petition against voters who signed a 1 million dollar check to deliver a check.
Mr. Trump and Mr. Musk support Wauquesha District Judge Brad Schimel in the Supreme Race, while the Democrats Dane District Judge Susan Crawford. Mr. Trump and his supported groups spent more than $ 20 million to help Mr. Schimel selected.
Ms. Crawford’s campaign refused to comment on appeal on Sunday.
The justice, which is asked to decide on the issue, is a liberal task that established a retirement seat and the court for the control of the court this year. The competition broke the national expenditure record for the judicial elections with more than $ 81 million.
Mr. Musk’s Political Action Committee used almost the same tactics before the presidential elections last year and offered to pay $ 1 million a day to the voters in Wisconsin and the other six warfare states that signed a petition supporting the first and second changes. A judge in Pennsylvania said that prosecutors could not show that efforts were an illegal lottery and allowed them to continue on the day of election.
The Court of Appeal said on Saturday that the Chief Public Prosecutor could not show that he had the right to receive an order that prevents Mr. Musk with a kanım a legal argument developed at a minimum level ”. The court also claimed that Mr. Kaul had refused to hear the case of the Columbia District Circuit Court, but he did not give any details about the action of the court.
There is no entry to the decision of the district court in the state’s online court database, and neither Mr. Kaul’s office nor the State Court Office gave the Associated Press to the court’s actions after the working hours of the court.
The Court of Appeal said, iz We are not allowed to be the first court to decide whether the participants have entered the alleged behavior or decide to decide to decide on the legal status of this behavior, ”he said.
Mr. Musk said on Friday, starting a mission on the social media platform X, he planned to örli personally delivering it to a pair of voters who have already broadcast voting papers in the race.
Mr. Musk later issued a statement, saying that money would go to people who will be “spokesperson ına for an online petition against“ activist ”judges. After saying that the event would be open to people who voted only in the Supreme Court race, the participation would be limited to those who signed the petition.
Again on Friday, Mr. Musk’s political action committee detected the buyer of the first $ 1 million gift, which donated to Wisconsin GOP and the conservative candidates in the court race and supported the agenda of Mr. Trump and his agenda.
The judicial election is expected to decide the voting rules that may affect the abortion rights of Wisconsin’s highest court, Congress Reduction, Union Power and 2026 midterm exams and the 2028 presidential elections in the state.
This story was reported by Associated Press.
