Wisconsin Chief Prosecutor asks the State Supreme Court to stop Musk’s payment of $ 1 million
Madison, Wis. – Wisconsin’s Chief Public Prosecutor asked the Liberal Controlled State Supreme Court on Sunday to stop the billionaire Elon Musk by giving checks over $ 1 million For two voters, President Donald Trump is an objection that came hours before his ally planned the gift at a evening rally.
A Court of Appeal on Saturday rejected legal difficulty By Democrat Josh Kaul, who argued that Musk’s proposal violated a state law that prohibits giving something valuable in exchange for votes.
Wisconsin’s ideological control of the court is strictly objected to the high court election on Tuesday. Liberals currently have 4-3 majority.
Musk’s Green Bay at 19:30 at the EST at the rally planned at the EST, “activist” online petition against voters who signed a 1 million dollar check to deliver a check.
Trump and Musk support Wauquesha District Judge Brad Schimel in the Supreme Court race, while the Democrats Dane District Judge Susan Crawford. Trump and groups supported by Schimel spent more than $ 20 million to help Schimel selection.
Crawford’s campaign avoided commenting on the appeal on Sunday.
The justice, which is asked to decide on the issue, is a liberal task that established a retirement seat and the court for the control of the court this year. The competition broke the national expenditure record for the judicial elections with more than $ 81 million.
Musk’s political action committee was used Almost the same tactic Before the presidential elections last year, Proposing to pay 1 million dollars a day to the voters in Wisconsin and the other six Battleground states that signed a petition supporting the first and second changes. A judge in Pennsylvania, prosecutors could not show The effort was an illegal lottery and allowed him to continue during the election day.
The Court of Appeal said on Saturday that the Chief Public Prosecutor could not show that he had the right to receive an order that prevents Musk with a kanım a legal argument developed at a minimum level ”. The court also claimed that Kaul had refused to hear the case of Columbia District Circuit Court, but did not give any details about the action of the court.
There is no entry to the decision of the district court in the online court database, and neither Kaul’s office nor the State Court Office gave the Associated Press to the Court’s actions after the working hours on Friday night.
The Court of Appeal said, iz We are not allowed to be the first court to decide whether the participants have entered the alleged behavior or decide to decide to decide on the legal status of this behavior, ”he said.
Musk said on Friday, in an article on the social media platform X, he plans to “deliver personally to a pair of voters. He already threw his ballot compasses In the race.
Musk then made a statement, saying that the money would go to people who will be “spokesperson için for an online petition against“ activist ”judges. After saying that the event would be open to people who voted only in the Supreme Court race, the participation would be limited to those who signed the petition.
Again on Friday, Musk’s political action committee set the first $ 1 million gift that donated to Wisconsin GOP and the conservative island in the court race and has a history of support for Trump and his agenda.
Judicial election, Wisconsin’s highest court is expected to decide Abortion rights– Congress redistribution– union power and voting rules that may affect the 2026 midterm exams and the 2028 Presidential elections in the state.
